- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:45:03 -0800
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw at chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw at chromium.org> wrote: >>> Big question: by what mechanism are these elements inert? >> >> I like Adam's suggestion of a new document without a browsing context. >> ?You can still move the elements into the active document and have >> them "just work", and all the other issues are taken care of "for >> free". > > I think that would be a fine solution. When I discussed this with > various folks, that option came up as well, but some were concerned > that a document might too heavy weight. > > Keep in mind that pages may have *many* <template> declarations. I'd > expect a sophisticated page/app to have template declarations the > hundreds if not thousands. Have you benchmarked it? Documents that lack browsing contexts are actually pretty light. Most of the "weight" comes from browsing context. As an example, we create and destroy a document every time someone assigns to innerHTML. Adam
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 14:45:03 UTC