- From: Chris Pearce <chris@pearce.org.nz>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:33:04 +1300
On 1/04/2011 12:22 p.m., Steve Lacey wrote: > Chris - in the mozilla stats, I agree on the need for a frame count of > frames that actually make it the the screen, but am interested in why > we need both presented and painted? Wouldn't just a simple 'presented' > (i.e. presented to the user) suffice? > We distinguish between "painted" and "presented" so we have a measure of the latency in our rendering pipeline. It's more for our benefit as browser developers than for web developers. Chris
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 17:33:04 UTC