> I always felt it had valid use-cases in *some* form -- namely, some > authors want conforming content, which means no <font>, while some > authors want markup that will work in crippled HTML processors like > Blackberry's e-mail client, which means they want <font>. The only > question was whether there was a use-case for <span > style="font-weight: bold">/<span style="font-style: italic"> instead > of <b>/<i>. I still don't think there is, but I realized it really > makes no difference -- authors can opt into CSS styling selectively on > a per-command basis, so it doesn't hurt to allow it. I thought that you were talking about use cases for CSS mode in general, not only those particular elements... EhsanReceived on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:41:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:31 UTC