- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:46:48 +0200
On 2011-06-17 09:36, Roland Steiner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Roland Steiner<rolandsteiner at google.com>wrote: >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/#the-scope-pseudo-class says: >> >> The :scope<http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/#scope> >> pseudo-class *must* match any element that is a contextual reference >> element<http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/#contextual-reference-element>. >> >> so :scope is ambiguous if you have several scoping elements as ancestors. >> :scope in a nested sheet, meant to limit the rule to the nested scoping >> element, may instead match against an enclosing scoping element. Again, see >> the example I mailed earlier. >> > > Actually, re-reading that section I think I misunderstood the meaning. If > only the direct parent of a<style scoped> is considered a contextual > reference element for rules in _that_ style-sheet (rather than an element > being a contextual reference element for _some_ scoped stylesheet), there is > no ambiguity. That is correct. However, note that the definition of :scope itself does not define which elements are the contextual reference elements (except where it defaults to the document root element) and it can it theory support more than one [1]. But it is up to the specification defining a particular context to define what the contextual reference elements are, and HTML5 needs to define that the contextual reference element for a given scoped stylesheet is its parent element. [1] In fact, the refNodes parameter of the querySelector* methods explicitly allows there to be more than one in that context. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 04:46:48 UTC