- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:14:22 -0700
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 6/16/11 2:32 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: >> >> What if we do this: >> >> 1) By default,<style scoped> ?implies that all selectors in this >> stylesheet are prefixed with ":scope". >> 2) Unless the ":scope" is already in the selector. > > I could live with that. > > Especially if we allowed the CSSOM in this situation to include the implied > ":scope" on selectors that did not include it in the text (in which case, > this is a simple parse-time transformation on the stylesheet). This sounds like the sanest way to go about it. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 14:14:22 UTC