- From: Roland Steiner <rolandsteiner@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:15:15 +0900
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 6/16/11 2:32 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > >> What if we do this: >> >> 1) By default,<style scoped> implies that all selectors in this >> stylesheet are prefixed with ":scope". >> 2) Unless the ":scope" is already in the selector. >> > > I could live with that. > > Especially if we allowed the CSSOM in this situation to include the implied > ":scope" on selectors that did not include it in the text (in which case, > this is a simple parse-time transformation on the stylesheet). > Nitpick: prefixing :scope is only equivalent to limiting selector matching to the current scope iff there is no ancestor scope. - Roland
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 22:15:15 UTC