- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:48:25 +0200
On 07/25/2011 05:30 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > Are JavaScript implementors willing to reimplement window.status? There > are obvious security problems with drawing an author-provided string > where a certain URI is expected, but could window.defaultStatus not set > the name (_NET_WM_NAME or equivalent) of the script's window and > window.status either override window.defaultStatus temporarily, or sent > to the user, e.g. through Growl or as a Windows toast. > The window name is already accessible to scripts (by modifying the text > child of <title> through the DOM) so no new security concerns are > introduced. The Growl binding might well be better by a new function, > though. If you want OS-level notifications you might be interested in [1] [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 01:48:25 UTC