- From: <aykut.sensoy@bild.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:59:40 +0000
hi julian, i have asked one from the seo team and he says for example the "freshness factor" is important for google. is it possible to use the time-tag in the head instead (i mean invisible)? dc:created is also not in the Meta Extensions List, see: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions Kind regards Aykut Am 18.07.11 15:27 schrieb "Julian Reschke" unter <julian.reschke at gmx.de>: >On 2011-07-18 14:54, aykut.sensoy at bild.de wrote: >> According to the w3c Validator the<metaname="date"content="#" /> tag >>is invalid. In the WHATWG MetaExtensions List there is no registered >>extension, no specification and no proposal for the date meta-tag. >> The only alternative for "date" is a proposal called "created", which >>however doesn't meet the requirements for registration . For our SEO >>team the date meta-tag contains some of the most important information >>about a webpage. >> What would be a w3c-valid way to implement a creation date meta-tag in >>html5? > >Out of curiosity: who is processing the tag? And what does this have to >do with SEO? Do search engines do anything with it? > > From HTML5's point of view the suggest replace is probably "<time >pubdate>"... Did you look at that already? > >Also: there seems to be overlap with Dublin Core's "dc:created"? > >Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 06:59:40 UTC