- From: <aykut.sensoy@bild.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:49:50 +0000
hi, this was only a mistake in the e-mail. you can see the meta-tag in the source code live at www.stylebook.de aykut Am 18.07.11 15:06 schrieb "Mat Carey" unter <mat at matcarey.co.uk>: >I'm not aware of the context, but is your problem the lack of spaces? > >You said: > >> <metaname="date"content="#" /> > >Did you mean: > ><meta name="date" content="#" /> > >Mat Carey > >On 18 Jul 2011, at 13:54, <aykut.sensoy at bild.de> wrote: > >> According to the w3c Validator the <metaname="date"content="#" /> tag >>is invalid. In the WHATWG MetaExtensions List there is no registered >>extension, no specification and no proposal for the date meta-tag. >> The only alternative for "date" is a proposal called "created", which >>however doesn't meet the requirements for registration . For our SEO >>team the date meta-tag contains some of the most important information >>about a webpage. >> What would be a w3c-valid way to implement a creation date meta-tag in >>html5? >> >> >> Kind Regards >> Aykut Sensoy >
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 06:49:50 UTC