- From: Ian Fette <ifette@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:40:27 -0700
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Glenn Maynard <glenn at zewt.org> wrote: > 2011/7/15 Ian Fette (????????) <ifette at google.com> > > Yes and no - both are sort of a poor man's Content-Disposition :) The >> question is whether we need to handle filename, and the proposal of >> download=filename at least maps content-disposition fully and compactly. >> > > Not fully; it lacks an equivalent for "Content-Disposition: inline; > filename=file". > > Ok, not fully, but at least covering what I would view to be the important use cases that are actually used in practice. > -- > Glenn Maynard > >
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 11:40:27 UTC