W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2011

[whatwg] a rel=attachment

From: Ian Fette <ifette@google.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:40:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF4kx8cDgGevMoXXCiyvTMsg26Gy_T6fTbBmjL+n=X9-U+bQbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Glenn Maynard <glenn at zewt.org> wrote:

> 2011/7/15 Ian Fette (????????) <ifette at google.com>
>
> Yes and no - both are sort of a poor man's Content-Disposition :) The
>> question is whether we need to handle filename, and the proposal of
>> download=filename at least maps content-disposition fully and compactly.
>>
>
> Not fully; it lacks an equivalent for "Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename=file".
>
>
Ok, not fully, but at least covering what I would view to be the important
use cases that are actually used in practice.


> --
> Glenn Maynard
>
>
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 11:40:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC