[whatwg] a rel=attachment

• From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:24:05 -0400
• Message-ID: <CABirCh8kc6Pup-BMYDvKbowwpq=Otp3Xh2v0SN+8YYqOu54Q1A@mail.gmail.com>

2011/7/15 Ian Fette (????????) <ifette at google.com>

> Yes and no - both are sort of a poor man's Content-Disposition :) The
> question is whether we need to handle filename, and the proposal of
> download=filename at least maps content-disposition fully and compactly.
>

Not fully; it lacks an equivalent for "Content-Disposition: inline;
filename=file".

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 11:24:05 UTC