- From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:58:58 +0000
?ann fim 14.j?l 2011 09:38, skrifa?i Oli Studholme: > in graphic design a footer contains supplementary information about > the content it follows. the spec initially disallowed ?fat footers?, > but the naming and common usage would have led to people using them > for fat footers regardless of the spec. they still contain > supplementary information about their sectioning element or sectioning > root. This semantic connection seems stronger to me than one based on > arbitrary size > Would it not be less confusing to forbid 'fat footers' and rename footer -> credit?
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2011 05:58:58 UTC