- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:02:45 -0800
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn at zewt.org> wrote: > > > The earlier condition that I think you mentioned seemed reasonable: > never say the page is "hidden" when it's not, eg. no false positives. > It's more harmful to tell a visible page that it's invisible, than to > tell an invisible page that it's visible: > > * ?visible? : the full-size page content may be at least partially > visible on at least one screen. > * ?hidden? : the full-size page content is not visible to the user at all. > > This gives implementations some latitude to decide whether a condition > should be treated as hidden, and doesn't require figuring out > precisely whether a window is visible in every case. > > Great point, Glenn. I agree completely. --Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20110104/46c2e004/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 17:02:45 UTC