[whatwg] Proposal for separating script downloads and execution

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:

>  I also think the other side benefits of this approach are significant, so
>> long as they don't make it too hard to implement.  That really needs
>> implementor feedback--if you can give that, let me know if you want a more
>> detailed recap.
>>
>
> I don't think I do.  Proposal 3 sounded fine to me last I saw it.
>

Including execute() being synchronous, raising SyntaxError exceptions for
parse errors, and uncaught exceptions from the script being propagated up
through execute() to its caller?

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 19:42:26 UTC