W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2011

[whatwg] Proposal: <intent> tag for Web Intents API

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:44:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia9icyzfHE8crfeAM-V2PriVSTshqYzSnKQwyUc6j_2wJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan at google.com> wrote:
> There isn't always a href, if left out the value action should be
> launched on the current page.
>
> We didn't want to add additional attributes to the meta tag or link
> tag just for intents, this seems to open up the flood gates for future
> platform features to also extend the meta syntax, the meta element
> then just becomes a dumping ground. ?If the answer when defining a new
> declarative standardized platform feature is to just arbitrarily add
> new attributes to the meta data element we will get to a point where
> either ?we have attributes that are used in multiple contexts or use
> of basic attribute name spacing such as "intent-".
>
> Looking at the spec[1] it appears there would still be a relatively
> large change to the html5 spec to accomodate these new attributes and
> conditional parsing guidelines.
>
> A new tag is simple, concise and encapsulates the features and
> requirements of the new platform feature and gives us scope to iterate
> for future versions without stepping on the toes of the other features
> that might use the meta tag.

Does that mean you're not interested in declaring this information in
the <head> ?

Adam


> [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-meta-elemen
>
> P
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:05:37 +0100, Greg Billock <gbillock at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The big ergonomic sticking point there is probably the |href|
>>> attribute, which we envision
>>> being able to do same-origin registration. Perhaps a similar <link
>>> rel="intent"> tag
>>> modification would be able to do that, though. Is that what you'd
>>> suggest? Do you think
>>> having two tags involved would be confusing?
>>
>>
>> If there's always an href attribute you could just go for <link> instead. I think you should go for one element and just add attributes as required. And if we want to put inside <head> that would be either <meta> or <link>.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anne van Kesteren
>> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Kinlan
> Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5
> G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan
> t: +447730517944
> tw: @Paul_Kinlan
> LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan
> Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me
> Skype: paul.kinlan
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 13:44:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:38 UTC