- From: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:42:25 -0400
On 11-08-03 2:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:02:58 +0200, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan at mozilla.com> > wrote: >> By this definition, it's ambiguous what needs to happen to the >> documentElement's undoScope attribute, since it doesn't have an >> element ancestor. I think we should just clarify that in that case, >> the value is "true", and the undoManager attribute is the same as >> document.undoManager. > > Maybe those should be merged? That way we do not need to extend Document. You mean contentEditable and undoScope? That would prohibit the use case of a web application which is not using contentEditable taking advantage of UndoManager... Ehsan
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 13:42:25 UTC