- From: <dennis@efjot.de>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:42:17 +0200
> This thread has in fact already received an "official" reply: I am sorry, I didn't recognize you were one of the "managers" here. I should've read more. > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028148.html > > That e-mail received a reply that I haven't responded to yet: > > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028182.html Strange, I didn't see this reply. I might have overlooked it, sorry. > E-mails sent to the WHATWG list eventually get a reply from me, at which > point, if appropriate, I edit the spec. Alright! I just wondered if there were any extra steps required. > For more details, please see the FAQ: > > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ I should have read it. > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> If you want this to be tracked, you should open a ticket in the W3C bug >> tracker. > > That's unnecessary; I guarantee that I will read and reply to every > e-mail > sent to this mailing list that provides new feedback. All pending e-mails > are tracked here: > > http://www.whatwg.org/issues/ Alright, but I didn't see the answer or my proposal here..? > (This is also why there's no point sending messages that don't introduce > new information, [...] -- I ignore those e-mails so they can't affect > the spec.) I understand. > HTH,
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 11:42:17 UTC