- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:01:35 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Dennis Joachimsthaler wrote: > > I'd like to bring this back to attention. > > I don't want this to be forgotten before anybody who is "official" has > said their definitive yes or no about it. This thread has in fact already received an "official" reply: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028148.html That e-mail received a reply that I haven't responded to yet: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028182.html > Or how else do new additions find their way into the draft? E-mails sent to the WHATWG list eventually get a reply from me, at which point, if appropriate, I edit the spec. For more details, please see the FAQ: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Julian Reschke wrote: > > If you want this to be tracked, you should open a ticket in the W3C bug > tracker. That's unnecessary; I guarantee that I will read and reply to every e-mail sent to this mailing list that provides new feedback. All pending e-mails are tracked here: http://www.whatwg.org/issues/ (This is also why there's no point sending messages that don't introduce new information, or just say "+1", or repeat an argument already stated in the thread -- I ignore those e-mails so they can't affect the spec.) HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 09:01:35 UTC