Am 25.11.2010 17:12 schrieb Nikita Popov: > On 25.11.2010 15:55, Biju wrote: >> The request I put is NOT about whether you can make it PRETTY looking >> or not. Sorry, that was how I understood point 1 your initial message. >> The question is about why we are allowing website have something which >> is MODAL >> (ie, both window modal and tab modal >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59314) >> In my opinion a no website should have that much control over user >> interaction. > Well, you just said it: Bug 59314! > That alert()s, prompt()s and confirm()s are window-modal is only an > implementation issue: Some years ago browsers implemented these prompts > the most convenient way: By opening a native modal dialog. But right now > broswer vendors realize that this isn't really the best solution - > because of DOS attacks and simply because it doesn't make any sense. > And as you already mentioned: Firefox landed tab-modal dialogs a few > days ago. Opera already had them. Opera even provided a "Stop executing scripts" checkbox in the alert() dialog for years already, which made it my preferred browser for debugging my scripts (handy if you have forgotten an i++ in a loop, and placed an alert() inside).Received on Thursday, 25 November 2010 08:53:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:28 UTC