- From: Odin Omdal Hørthe <odin.omdal@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 12:53:10 +0200
2010/5/23 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com>: > I guess I'm starting to talk myself into wanting a more HTML-like > format than WebSRT that scales to provide full features by using > existing Web technology. I'd be curious to hear what others think... I want to use it for slide sync information. Right now I have a websocket that listens for the file name it wants to show (as next image slide), but it's IMPOSSIBLE to sync video/slides with the features that are in browsers now. Because I can't get the real timestamp from the Ogg Theora video. Also, having that "what slide are we on" information in the video stream is also rather nice. If WebSRT had classes, it could be used for all sorts of things. You would parse the incoming WebSRT-stream in javascript and use stylesheets to build text overlays like youtube has etc. Always a tradeoff between easy format and features. If you could optionally put html in there to do advanced stuff that might work. With some rules for readers that don't understand 3., just stripping all tags and showing the result; or even have a method for saying "don't show this if you don't support fancy stuff". I might be trying to mix this in a bad way. Anyway, as of now I'm just waiting for a way to tell my webapp what slide we're on (sync with the live streaming video). -- Beste helsing, Odin H?rthe Omdal <odin.omdal at gmail.com> http://velmont.no
Received on Sunday, 23 May 2010 03:53:10 UTC