- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:46:16 +0200
On Thu, 20 May 2010 12:36:36 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp at opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 11:55:01 +0200, Robert O'Callahan > <robert at ocallahan.org> wrote: > >> I just became aware that application/octet-stream is excluded from >> being a >> type "the user agent knows it cannot render". >> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#a-type-that-the-user-agent-knows-it-cannot-render >> Apparently this was done in response to a bug report: >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7977 >> Neither the bug report nor the editor's response give any indication why >> this change was made. > > This bug report was about application/octet-stream *with parameters*, > e.g. application/octet-stream; codecs="theora, vorbis". The spec had the > requirement about application/octet-stream before that bug report. > > >> This change means files served with application/octet-stream will make >> it >> all the way to the step "If the media >> data<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#media-data>can >> be fetched but is found by inspection to be in an unsupported format >> ...", so implementations have to add support for binary sniffing for >> all the >> types they support. We didn't need this before in Gecko. What was the >> motivation for adding this implementation requirement? The spec requires binary sniffing for all the types you support even without the application/octet-stream requirement, since a WebM file labelled as video/ogg should play if both video/webm and video/ogg are supported. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 03:46:16 UTC