- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:41:00 -0700
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:11 AM, bjartur <svartman95 at gmail.com> wrote: > -------- > > This is yet another proposal to replace <video>, <audio>, <model> etc with a single element: <include>. You indicate that you are aware of the previous proposals to provide a single element for all media resources. Are you aware of the counter-arguments against them? If so, what is your answer to them? At the moment all you've done is provide a marginally different syntax than what's come before, but syntax was never an issue with previous unified-media elements. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 08:41:00 UTC