- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:27:49 +0200
On Tue, 18 May 2010 04:38:21 +0200, Shiki Okasaka <shiki at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:27 PM, K?hn Wolfgang <wo.kuehn at enbw.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> As for the html5 elements, will there be a new package >> org.w3c.dom.html5? > > This is our concern, too. Historically each W3C specification > introduced its own module name. However, the recent specifications > tend to omit the module specification in the IDL definition. > > cf. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1380.html > > In the IDL files we used above, we chose module names that seem to be > practical, but those are not part of the standard. Hopefully more > people will revisit this issue sometime soon. Can't they all just use org.w3c.dom? We cannot make the interface names overlap anyway. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 23:27:49 UTC