- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:39:09 +0100
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 09:33 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 5/11/10 7:47 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > Another detection technique based on the computed style of the > > 'font-family' property would work much better. > > Uh... the computed value of font-family is just the specified value (CSS > 2.1 section 15.3). So no, you can't detect _used_ font-family values > based on the computed value in this case. > > -Boris > Is there really much of a need for this though? CSS as it stands has support for a list of fonts to be specified for an element, and a browser can go through them until it finds one that is installed. The only argument I've seen is that various fonts are obviously different sizes, and so falling back to a different font might look best if the font-size also changed with it. However, I don't think it's such a great idea for fonts to be used as a layout tool. The layout should be fluid enough for minor font differences. This is not forgetting that the font a designer specifies for a page might be completely overridden by a user for a variety of reasons (larger fonts for someone with a visual disability, colour changes for someone with dyslexia, etc) Lastly, if a designer really needs to specify the exact font used on a page, then CSS3 has an area for embedded fonts (which are supported in various forms on the major browsers) Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100511/530275e2/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 06:39:09 UTC