- From: Schalk Neethling <schalk@ossreleasefeed.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 22:45:03 +0200
I guess this is the 'Paving the cowpaths' situation. Is there a 'standard' where most developers do as in the sample by Ted? Also, I cannot see a backwards compatibility issue as the uri attribute on cite should be optional. So if a developer used cite and then wrapped the containing text in a link, that would work fine. Going forward, the same developer can opt into using the new uri attribute of cite as opposed to wrapping the text in a link. Schalk Neethling -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Edward O'Connor Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:15 PM To: Simpson, Grant Leyton Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Expanding the cite element > Is there any value in adding an "href" or "uri" or similar attribute > to the <cite> element to indicate a location for a work (or > information about the work) or, in the case of a URI, an indicator > that can be used as a reference programmatically? <cite uri> has a much worse fallback story than simply embedding a link in <cite>. > <p>As Ashley Crandall Amos says in <cite > uri="http://example.com/books/crandall/linguisticmeans">Linguistic > Means of Determining the Dates of Old English Literary Texts</cite> > ... Amos also mentions in <cite > uri="http://example.com/books/crandall/linguisticmeans">Linguistic > Means</cite></p> Consider how the above would work in legacy browsers, and then consider how this would work in them: <p>As Ashley Crandall Amos says in <cite><a href="http://example.com/books/crandall/linguisticmeans">Linguistic Means of Determining the Dates of Old English Literary Texts</a></cite> ... Amos also mentions in <cite><a href="http://example.com/books/crandall/linguisticmeans">Linguistic Means</a></cite></p> Ted
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:45:03 UTC