W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2010

[whatwg] Video Tag Proposal

From: David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:15:35 +0100
Message-ID: <fbad4e141003280715y2c493c9di117aa93e1ff0a429@mail.gmail.com>
2010/3/28 Remco <remco47 at gmail.com>:

> This is what I don't understand either. It's not like H.264 won't be
> successful if another baseline format is specified in the
> recommendation. So, all this PR about submarine patents to scare
> people away from unencumbered formats is not necessary. Recommending
> an unencumbered format like MPEG 1 or H.263 or Dirac or Theora (the
> last one having the best quality of the bunch) will help tremendously
> with the standardization of the Internet, and if Apple wants to use a
> different format for their higher-quality videos, that's fine too.


One editor works for Apple, the other works for Google.


- d.
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2010 07:15:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:22 UTC