- From: Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:11:32 +0100
On 2010-03-18 13:13, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 18.03.2010 03:37, Roger H?gensen wrote: >> I searched the list, and looked at the HTML5 briefly and found nothing, >> nor can I ever recall such. >> So this is both a question and a proposal. >> >> On my own site currently I mostly replicate the first paragraph of an >> article in my journal as the meta description, >> and write one up for other pages, usually replicating some of the >> content. >> ... > > See related W3C bug: > <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7577>. > > Best regards, Julian > Thanks Julian, looking at that found me the link to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0990.html It suggests <link rel="description" href="#desc" />, which is ok I guess. But why not simply allow this instead: <meta name="description" href="#desc" /> Existing parsers would notice that content="" is missing which is stated as being required, parsers that have been updated would notice there is a href="" instead, so search engines could just look for that id in the page. I think this would have the highest success rate. If backwards compatibility is such a major concern then this could be done: <meta name="description" content="" href="#desc" /> I'm unsure what gives the best result for varous parsers though, would empty content make them behave the same as if the meta tag was not there at all? Or would a empty tag cause them to use "" as the actual page description? I'd prefer to have the content attribute missing instead myself, but... Regards, Roger. -- Roger "Rescator" H?gensen. Freelancer - http://EmSai.net/
Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 06:11:32 UTC