- From: Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:43:55 +0100
On 2010-03-18 10:04, Ashley Sheridan wrote: > The main problem with that would be that parsers would then need to > read into the <body> of the page to produce a description of your > site. This might not produce much of an overhead on a one-off basis, > but imagine a parser that is grabbing the description from hundreds or > thousands of pages, then this could become a bit of a problem. I do not see how that is any more or less of an problem than today with pages that have meta description missing, what do those parsers do then? Do they stop at </head> ? What do they use as description instead? The first paragraph? The parsers used by all major search engines certainly do not halt, they break down the entire page right? As for delays, that is not an issue for consumers, I can not recall any browser ever showing me the meta description unless I explicitly view page properties. I can imagine that the seeing impaired community would love something like this, as it would basically tell screenreaders that "this" is the first paragraph/summary/description/teaser of the page, allowing blind people to more rapidly jump from page to page. Currently the meta description is not always good content, would be interesting to see a Google analysis of how the meta description is used, i.e. how many are basically repeating page content (like I do) and how many just dump keywords in there, how many pages on a site have a site wide identical description? And so on. Roger. -- Roger "Rescator" H?gensen. Freelancer - http://EmSai.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100319/f704879b/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 05:43:55 UTC