- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:09:13 -0700
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Mike Shaver <mike.shaver at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> wrote: >> Bottom of the charter: http://www.whatwg.org/charter >> >> I believe the decision process is knife fight to first blood. > > "Editors should reflect the consensus opinion of the working group > when writing their specifications, but it is the document editor's > responsibility to break deadlocks when the working group cannot come > to an agreement on an issue" doesn't sound like the working group can > override anything, and only goes as far as "should". > > It turns out that two of the Members are in the same building as me, > though, so I'll go see what they think the model is. ?I think they may > be surprised to discover that they could have overridden Ian on > anything! I wasn't precise in my language - don't read too much into my exact wording. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 15:09:13 UTC