W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2010

[whatwg] Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:09:13 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikU4k0UzsMQiteC3L8N71CsN_Qgk3up76iW3vyv@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Mike Shaver <mike.shaver at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bottom of the charter: http://www.whatwg.org/charter
>> I believe the decision process is knife fight to first blood.
> "Editors should reflect the consensus opinion of the working group
> when writing their specifications, but it is the document editor's
> responsibility to break deadlocks when the working group cannot come
> to an agreement on an issue" doesn't sound like the working group can
> override anything, and only goes as far as "should".
> It turns out that two of the Members are in the same building as me,
> though, so I'll go see what they think the model is. ?I think they may
> be surprised to discover that they could have overridden Ian on
> anything!

I wasn't precise in my language - don't read too much into my exact wording.

Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 15:09:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:24 UTC