W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2010

[whatwg] Form validation against invisible controls

From: Bruce de Graaf <WeBMartians@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:29:57 -0400
Message-ID: <4C177245.9030605@verizon.net>
I remember an article that stated that "required" was used 29 times more 
often than "mandatory" in instructions and specifications (WWWeb pages 
were mentioned as being part of the search source).

Mandatory implies that there may be reprisals for failure to comply, 
because, and, secondarily, such failures could lead to loss of sovereign 

Required has no connotation that failure to comply will result in loss 
of integrity and, while cooperation may be conditional, certainly, does 
not intimate retribution.
On 2010-06-14 07:04, Michelangelo De Simone wrote:
> Il giorno 14/giu/2010, alle ore 12.40, Ian Hickson ha scritto:
>> Incorrect use of "required" in HTML4-era documents also seems to be the
>> common problem Chrome ran into -- at the risk of starting a bikeshed
>> discussion, does anyone have any good suggestions for alternative names?
> I believe "mandatory" would keep the same semantic and clarity "required" does.
> --
> Bye,
> Michelangelo
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 05:29:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:24 UTC