- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:52:27 +1000
I don't think that is possible in the way that the volume attribute is currently defined as a value between [0;1]. That is an orthogonal, but still important question about the volume attribute then. So, if you say 300%, I assume you mean 3 times louder than what the track is given as? I do wonder how to do that with the current volume attribute - right now the spec says that the default value set is 1.0 [1]. It seems that means we cannot amplify a quiet audio track but have to rely on the user to turn up the volume on their computer? I would actually prefer if the default setting was something like 0.5 and we could then turn the volume up or down in javascript or preferably event through a content attribute as mentioned. Cheers, Silvia. [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#dom-media-volume On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Kevin Marks <kevinmarks at gmail.com> wrote: > Setting volume above 1.0 can be very useful if the original is too quiet. > For example, Quicktime allows a volume of 300% to amplify quiet tracks > > On May 31, 2010 11:30 PM, "Philip J?genstedt" <philipj at opera.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:17:03 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer > <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Ju... > > This would make volume even more special, as a float that reflects as an > integer percentage. Just using the existing definition for reflecting a > float would be simpler. > >>> So, I am neither in favor or against of reflecting volume and mute as >>> content attributes. Im... > > I'd be fine with reflecting muted if many people think it would be useful. > I'm not the one to make that judgment though. > > Volume isn't a huge problem, just not as trivial as one might suspect. > Another thing to consider is that it is currently impossible to set volume > to a value outside the range [0,1] via the DOM API. With a content > attribute, volume="-1" and volume="1.1" would need to be handled too. I'd > prefer it being ignored rather than being clamped. > >>> [1] >>> >>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/urls.html#reflect >> >> >> >> Ch... > > -- > Philip J?genstedt > Core Developer > Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 18:52:27 UTC