- From: narendra sisodiya <narendra@narendrasisodiya.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:56:36 +0530
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c at gmail.com<Simetrical%2Bw3c at gmail.com> > wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:29 PM, narendra sisodiya > <narendra at narendrasisodiya.com> wrote: > > Case 1 - Abode can make its flash-player inside canvas API. I know, it > will > > not be 100% compatible. They can create a CanvasAPI based flash player. > > Their are already 2 client side run time engine in JavaScript - > Smokescreen > > and Gordon - http://twitter.com/jdowdell/statuses/14985295733 , Biggest > > advantage with JS and client side is that you can see sourcecode. In > order > > to hide the source code , Adobe can use server side. Some processing will > be > > on server side and output will be streamed (in form of image) to client > side > > and renders into CANVAS area with pixel. You can grab event from canvas > area > > and send bacl to server. This way Developer may come up with a Server > Side > > HTML5 toolkit which will reuse BAD standards like flash with Hiding > Source > > code of a Web Application . Adobe or other companies can modify their > > products and generate server side HTML5 code which will render the > > application CANVAS API. > > A huge number of dummy developer use such non-standards tools and with > this, > > they will be able to reuse skills by this and will not adopt a true > spirit > > of HTML5. > > So, This I do not like,,,--> ''designer/developers will be > using > > non-standard server side code, generated from non-standards ToolKits, and > > pretend that we also use HTML5" > > The goal of HTML5 is that all browsers and platforms should be able to > display all web pages, without dependence on any particular software > vendor. If a company like Adobe writes a framework using > cross-browser, cross-platform, openly specified APIs, we're in a far > better situation than now. It would really be no different from > jQuery. > > Yes, sure, I love to advocate adobe/similarcompany and modify my video - http://tinyvid.tv/show/2dz18ka146nfz , Provided they should do it in Client side so source can be seen.* Providing a server side or similar rendering system which use 'Canvas' for displaying everything inside canvas from server side is as bad as flash player/plugin.Web may be hidden again under pixels.* > Furthermore, it's not *possible* to prevent anyone from writing > toolkits that use HTML5 features. Or do you have any suggestions to > stop it? > We can't stop anyone. Advocate SVG and making SVG-animation support with SVG animation authoring tools is a good way to reduce 'server side canvas rendering'. -- ??????????????????????????? ? Narendra Sisodiya ? http://narendrasisodiya.com ??????????????????????????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100610/c6b83b77/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 12:26:36 UTC