- From: Chris Pearce <chris@pearce.org.nz>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:25:08 +1200
On 23/07/2010 8:57 p.m., Philip J?genstedt wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:25:37 +0200, Chris Pearce <chris at pearce.org.nz> > wrote: >> Should we be periodically firing a "stalled" event at the media >> element while we've suspended download of a preload:none or >> preload:metadata media? >> [...] > > I think this is a spec bug. When a UA decides to not download more > data it should fire the suspend event. It doesn't make any sense to > also fire the stalled event, in my opinion, but the spec isn't clear > about this. I agree. We should make the spec clearer here. > > Also, I don't understand why the stalled event would be fired > periodically in any case, why would that be so? > Agreed, it doesn't make sense to fire multiple stalled events; you can detect when the download resumes by listening for subsequent progress events. On 23/07/2010 5:11 p.m., Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > To me, stalled implies that the UA is trying to receive stuff, but is > being stalled. So, my understanding is that the resource fetch > algorithm in [1] should include the word "unexpectedly" - that would > fix it. I think this suggested wording change would be a good one. Regards, Chris Pearce.
Received on Friday, 23 July 2010 15:25:08 UTC