- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:38:36 -0600
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr at me.com> wrote: > * require that?enterFullscreen() is being called inside a user-event handler > (e.g. click or keypress) to avoid drive-by fullscreen annoyances. This one seems kind of weird. Does the spec currently distinguish significantly between a user-initiated click and a script-initiated one? > * disallow?enterFullscreen() from a frame or iframe Makes sense, though consider its interaction with sandboxed iframes (that is, you may actually *want* the ability to turn on fullscreen-ability for an iframe). > * show an animation as the window enters fullscreen so the user can see the > transition taking place How would this interact with an author hooking CSS Transitions to the element keyed on the :fullscreen pseudoclass? If we implement the actual fullscreen effect essentially purely in CSS, I'd prefer the minimum amount of magic here. > * show an hard-to-spoof overlay with some text that tells the user that they > can use the Escape key to exit fullscreen, and prevent the page from > capturing this keypress. > * show an affordance to allow the user to exit fullscreen (e.g. a close > button) when the user moves the mouse Both of these make a lot of sense to me, and match the way fullscreen effects work today, so users will understand it. > * make the location field available to the user so that they can see the URL > even when in fullscreen This partially defeats the purpose of fullscreen. ^_^ Though, it may be worthwhile to do so anyway, as it would be a major indicator that something is being spoofed. > * drop out of fullscreen if navigating to another page Sounds very reasonable. > * if focussed on an element, drop out of fullscreen if that element is > removed from the DOM Definitely a good idea. > * limit arbitrary keyboard input unless 'enableKeys' is true Already has some history, so would probably be a decent idea. > * disallow window.open etc. while in fullscreen I don't fully understand this restriction's justification. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2010 20:38:36 UTC