- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, WeBMartians wrote: > > Hmmm... Maybe it would be better to say ISO-646US rather than ASCII. > There is a lot of impreciseness about the very low value characters > (less than 0x20 space) in the ASCII "specifications." The same can be > said about the higher end. Where the interpretation was normative, I've used the term "ANSI_X3.4-1968 (US-ASCII)" and referenced RFC1345. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2010 01:02:35 UTC