W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2010

[whatwg] Microdata feedback

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001190823380.3970@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > I've made it redirect to the spec.
> Could you say that the URL *should* provide human-readable information 
> about the vocabulary?  We all know the problems with having 
> centrally-stored machine-readable data about your specs, but encouraging 
> the URL to provide human-readable info seems helpful.  (If they aren't 
> supposed to be dereferenced, why use HTTP?)

Why indeed. Is there something else we could use instead?

> > Graphs are intended to be supported in v2, using a mechanism
> You seem to have left this sentence unfinished.

...using a mechanism intended for that purpose. Nothing to see here. :-)

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> SHOULD return human-readable information is good, if you also add SHOULD 
> NOT automatically dereference.

I've added something akin to that SHOULD NOT, but the spec doesn't have a 
"specification" conformance class, so there's nothing to apply the SHOULD 
to. So I haven't added it. (I don't generally think specifications being 
conformance classes really makes much sense.)

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 01:50:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:20 UTC