W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2010

[whatwg] about:blank synchronicity

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001182301190.3759@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/13/10 4:56 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > The spec currently distinguishes between the initial about:blank load
> > (creation of a new browsing context), which actually doesn't involve
> > navigation, and navigating to about:blank.
> > 
> > It seems like simply making the first one synchronous, but making the
> > latter asynchronous, would satisfy your use case. Would other vendors be
> > ok with this?
> 
> In case it wasn't clear from the relevant Gecko thread, I would personally be
> fine with this.  That said, would "initial about:blank load" only include
> <iframe/> (no src at all), or also <iframe src=""/> or also <iframe
> src="about:blank"/>?  I suspect it doesn't matter that much, actually, but
> would welcome confirmation.

It would include any browsing context creation, including, e.g. 
window.open(), <object> pointing to an HTML file before the HTML file is 
loaded, etc.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 15:02:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:20 UTC