- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:46:09 -0800
And it is worth saying that a copyright notice is not a license. "Copyright Martin Luther 1517" doesn't tell you anything at all about what permissions Martin is granting you. And rights permissions languages are much more complex... On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:06 , timeless wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:53 AM, will surgent <willeom at gmail.com> wrote: >> It would be nice if there was a copyright attribute for the HTML 5 img tag. >> This would make it easy for users and search engines to filter out images >> that can not be used for certain purposes. > > external metadata on copyright is a disaster. it gets lost immediately. > > GIF and friends have supported embedding (c) into images for decades. > > As google is fully capable of caching images (and obviously does so), > I question how adding a tag to html will solve a problem which is > already solved by the native image formats themselves. > > For lack of a more useful reference about comment fields, i'll just > point to one application which is aware of them (although at the time > of the posting it only supported them for certain image types): > http://www.group42.com/ts-wi04.htm David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2010 09:46:09 UTC