- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:45:27 +0100
will surgent <willeom at gmail.com> schrieb am Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:40:12 -0500: > That sounds like good idea (about the audio and video elements being > included as-well). I just thought of it because Google does not allow > one to specify the copyright or license in an image search as far as > I know. having a license attribute would make it intuitive for > developers to add the license the same way title and alt attributes > are specified. Okay, so there is HTML5 Microdata and RDFa that does this (and more). If you didn't know, you can specify a license for content with @rel=license also. What else exactly do you need ? Cheers -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100111/799c55ee/attachment.pgp>
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 10:45:27 UTC