- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:53:12 +0000
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 17:54 -0500, L. David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 2010-02-18 16:45 -0600, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > Anne suggested in IRC using the pseudoclass approach, and pairing it > > with the ::value pseudoelem from the Basic UI Module. You could get > > But the key question (from the Webkit bug) is really whether the UA > styles apply to the input itself or a pseudo-element inside of it. > > If the UA style is > input:has-placeholder { color: ... } > then, as far as I can tell, there's no point to styling the ::value. > > If the UA style is > input:has-placeholder::value { color: ... } > then you get the same cascading result as with an input::placeholder > pseudo-element (styles that don't select the pseudo-element don't > change the UA default), but with the addition that authors can style > the input in other ways. > > -David > I think all the styling can be done without the ::value part, as regular styling of the element will change the styling of the value. (I hope I've got the understanding of ::value right, but Googling ignores the :: !) Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100218/e21662f2/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 14:53:12 UTC