- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:45:49 -0500
On Thursday 2010-02-18 17:40 -0500, L. David Baron wrote: > I'd be inclined towards the pseudo-class, though, partly since that > failure mode bothers me less, and partly since it's a lot simpler > (maybe not to implement in one engine, but probably to implement > interoperably and to specify, since you need to be careful about > what applies and doesn't apply to the pseudo-element). And the other advantage of a pseudo-class is that it lets the author style the input in other ways, which might be desirable. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 14:45:49 UTC