- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:15:54 +0000
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 07:17 -0800, Eric Carlson wrote: > On Feb 15, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Tim Hutt wrote: > > > Anyway, with respect to the actual discussion. My vote is to add two > > optional tags to <video> > > > > I assume you mean to add these to the <source> element rather than <video>? > > > > : bitrate="800" (in kb/s) and > > > > If a UA is to use bitrate as a selection criteria, what data should it base the selection on? Would you have it ping the server where the resource is located? If so, how much data should it be required to read? > > eric > Well, if there were a choice of bitrates, mobile devices could choose the lowest (assuming the other bitrate versions were all the same format, etc). I'm not sure whether this is something that would be better handled from the server though, to deliver media based on the user agent it can see? Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100216/45732fc4/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 07:15:54 UTC