- From: TAMURA, Kent <tkent@chromium.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:43:05 +0900
I agree with Erik. It's useful if the pseudo classes work without a <form> element and name attribute. <input> element is often used without a <form> element in web applications. A related topic: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#definitions <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#definitions> > Note: An element can still suffer from these states even when the > element is disabled; thus these states can be represented in the > DOM even if validating the form during submission wouldn't indicate > a problem to the user. This paragraph mentions only "disabled". But it means ValidityState also works without a form element, without a name attribute, or with a readonly attribute, right? An element is a "candidate for constraint validation" if 1. it is a validatable type, e.g. true if <input type=number>, false if <input type=reset> 2. has no "disabled" attribute, 3. has no "readonly" attribute, 4. inside of a <form> element, 5. has non-empty "name" attribute, and 6. not inside of a <datalist> element. I hope ValidityState and the pseudo classes ignores 2-6. On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:56, Erik Arvidsson <arv at chromium.org> wrote: > At the moment an input element needs to part of a form and have a name > attribute for the CSS pseudo classes :valid and :invalid to be > applied. [1] These limitations forces people to make their DOM more > complicated just to be able to use these pseudo classes. It might have > made sense to have these limitations in a world where JavaScript was > not available but in many modern web apps there is no need for forms > nor name attributes. > Can we please remove these limitations? > Erik Arvidsson > [1] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34733#c7 (included below > for completeness) > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#association-of-controls-and-forms > > Constraint validation: If an element has no form owner, it is barred > > from constraint validation. > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#naming-form-controls > > Constraint validation: If an element does not have a name attribute > > specified, or its name attribute's value is the empty string, then > > it is barred from constraint validation. > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#pseudo-classes > > :valid > > The :valid pseudo-class must match all elements that are candidates for > > constraint validation and that satisfy their constraints. > > > > :invalid > > The :invalid pseudo-class must match all elements that are candidates > > for constraint validation but that do not satisfy their constraints. > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#candidate-for-constraint-validation > > A listed form-associated element is a candidate for constraint > > validation except when a condition has barred the element from > > constraint validation. -- TAMURA Kent Software Engineer, Google -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100214/107acdaa/attachment-0001.htm>
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2010 21:43:05 UTC