- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:50:50 -0800
It's a good point. Curious to hear what other people are thinking. / Jonas On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Nicholas Zakas <nzakas at yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > To me ?asynchronous? fundamentally means ?doesn?t block other things from > happening,? so if async currently does block the load event from firing then > that seems very wrong to me. > > > > -Nicholas > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Commander Lock: "Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you believe!" > > Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to." > > ________________________________ > > From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org > [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Brian Kuhn > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:03 AM > To: Jonas Sicking > Cc: Steve Souders; WHAT Working Group > Subject: Re: [whatwg] should async scripts block the document's load event? > > > > Right. ?Async scripts aren't really asynchronous if they block all the > user-visible functionality that sites currently tie to window.onload. > > > > I don't know if we need another attribute, or if we just need to change the > behavior for all async scripts. ?But I think the best time to fix this is > now; before too many UAs implement async. > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > > Though what we want here is a DONTDELAYLOAD attribute. I.e. we want > load to start asap, but we don't want the load to hold up the load > event if all other resources finish loading before this one. > > / Jonas > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Steve Souders <whatwg at souders.org> wrote: >> I just sent email last week proposing a POSTONLOAD attribute for scripts. >> >> -Steve >> >> On 2/10/2010 5:18 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Brian Kuhn<bnkuhn at gmail.com> ?wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> No one has any thoughts on this? >>>> It seems to me that the purpose of async scripts is to get out of the >>>> way >>>> of >>>> user-visible functionality. ?Many sites currently attach user-visible >>>> functionality to window.onload, so it would be great if async scripts at >>>> least had a way to not block that event. ?It would help minimize the >>>> affect >>>> that secondary-functionality like ads and web analytics have on the user >>>> experience. >>>> -Brian >>>> >>> >>> I'm concerned that this is too big of a departure from how people are >>> used to<script>s behaving. >>> >>> If we do want to do something like this, one possibility would be to >>> create a generic attribute that can go on things like<img>,<link >>> rel=stylesheet>,<script> ?etc that make the resource not block the >>> 'load' event. >>> >>> / Jonas >>> >> > >
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 11:50:50 UTC