- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:32:44 +0100
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Kornel Lesinski wrote: >> However, if we're going to introduce token-based sandbox anyway, I >> suggest putting token in tag name: >> >> <sandbox-$token>...</sandbox-$token> >> >> where $token is the random part. This avoids oddity of attributes in >> closing tag, and is compatible with XML. In XML you could also use: >> >> <$token:sandbox xmlns:$token="?"></$token:sandbox> > > No, you couldn't use a namespace like that, because then the sandbox > element would not be in the HTML namespace, and thus would not have any > known semantics. Um, ignore me. I'm just not thinking properly today. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 06:32:44 UTC