- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:34:57 -0400
On 8/29/10 1:53 PM, Joshua Cranmer wrote: > Most authors don't care about whether or not an implementation supports > an entire, full specification; they just want to know "Can I use this > feature in this browser?" So saying that all major implementations > support much of CSS 2 to a high degree of correctness is useless for > knowing if, say, the author can use display: run-in. In particular because while there are implementations that claim to support display: run-in trying to actually _use_ it leads to grief quickly in most of them unless your page is static. > In other words, the > feature tables that you think are indicative of a problem are what web > authors would actually use in real life. What's sad is that there aren't really any good ones I've seen. For example, all the ones I've seen have a yes/no entry for "display:run-in"... and then try to bin browsers into those bins. -Bois
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2010 11:34:57 UTC