- From: Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:32:17 -0400
Ah, thanks. I guess the error is just confusing then in that it calls it "XHTML element noscript", which led me to think that it was indeed part of XHTML. I think some indication otherwise might prove beneficial to users. But, I thought XHTML5 was just an XML serialization of HTML5, so why is this the case? I just read the rationale behind it, but despite not being best practice shouldn't it be at the very least allowed? On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:10:44 +0200, Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I am using noscript as permitted, "In a head element of an HTML >> document, if there are no ancestor noscript elements." but still >> getting an error from Validator.nu saying it's not allowed. > > <noscript> is HTML-only. I.e. not allowed in XHTML. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Friday, 27 August 2010 03:32:17 UTC