- From: David Bruant <bruant@enseirb-matmeca.fr>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:12:08 +0200
Hi, Note after "10.1.1 The DOCTYPE" : "DOCTYPEs are required for legacy reasons. When omitted, browsers tend to use a different rendering mode that is incompatible with some specifications. Including the DOCTYPE in a document ensures that the browser makes a best-effort attempt at following the relevant specifications." Reading the following description, I have the impression that HTML6 will require a DOCTYPE as well. Following the hypothesis that the HTML language or HTML parser definition may change, it means that HTML6 may need a different DOCTYPE than HTML5 in order to "[follow] the relevant specifications". What will this doctype be since it cannot be <!DOCTYPE HTML>? The underlying question being : shouldn't doctype be versioned (as it has been with HTML 3.2/4/4.01 and XHTML 1/1.1)? David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100825/55b9685c/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:12:08 UTC