- From: Diego Perini <diego.perini@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:45:24 +0200
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote: > >> A more hypothetical use would be a rich text editor that has a "convert to >> plaintext" feature. textContent is not as useful for these use cases, since >> it doesn't handle line breaks and unrendered whitespace properly. >> > > There are lots of ways people might want to do that. For example, "convert > to plaintext" features often introduce characters for list bullets (e.g. > '*') and item numbers. (E.g., Mac TextEdit does.) Safari 5 doesn't do > either. > > I believe we are mixing up concepts here: - converting one format to another format (see "convert to plain text" above) - extracting the textual part of a format (what "innerText" is supposed to do) are completely different approaches and should probably be handled by different methods. Diego > The Gecko plaintext serializer has a comment: > // Output methods flag bits. There are a frightening number of these, > // because everyone wants something a little bit different > Satisfying more than a small number of potential users with a single > attribute may be difficult. > > Rob > -- > "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for > they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures > every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11] > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100816/1124b19b/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 07:45:24 UTC