- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010, Joseph Pecoraro wrote: > > Should window.name be [Replaceable]? If there are pages that depend on it being replaceable, or if browsers have reliably implemented it that way, then yes. > https://bug-19967-attachments.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=60491 > > Browser Results: > > - Safari 5 / WebKit Nightly and Chrome 5 > NOT [Replaceable], printing "string,string,string" > > - Firefox 3.6.3 / 3.7a5 and Opera 10.5.3 / 10.6 > [Replaceable], printing "string,string,number" > > - I didn't have access to IE to test. I'd appreciate > someone giving it a shot to see how they act. I am told IE says "string,string,string" (thanks to Tab and Aryeh). This argues that we should not make it replaceable unless it breaks pages. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:03:06 UTC